In-Memory Column Store simple example and performance comparison

Preamble

One of the top 12.1.0.2 feature is the In-Memory column store that store tables’ figures in memory in a (compressed) column format for faster access. The important thing is that it does not changed the default row store on disk (in tablespaces), it adds a memory column store for fast ad hoc queries with less impact on current workload. This is a non-free Enterprise edition option.

From Oracle official documentation In-Memory column store works great for below operation:

A query that scans a large number of rows and applies filters that use operators such as the following: =, <, >, and IN
A query that selects a small number of columns from a table or materialized view with a large number of columns, such as a query that selects five columns from a table with 100 columns
A query that joins a small table to a large table
A query that aggregates data

While, again from Oracle official documentation, it does not improve performance for:

Queries with complex predicates
Queries that select a large number of columns
Queries that return a large number of rows
Queries with multiple large table joins

The example I had in mind was a small dimension table (few cities) joined with a big fact tables (cities sales). So should perfectly fit in the “A query that joins a small table to a large table” category…

My test system is Oracle 12.1.0.2.0 Enterprise Edition running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago).

Oracle database In-Memory Base Level Feature has been made free starting with 19.8 Release Update. To ensure you stick with free options set:

  • INMEMORY_FORCE = BASE_LEVEL
  • INMEMORY_SIZE = 16GB

In-memory test case preparation

Small dimension table containing few French cities:

DROP TABLE city;
 
CREATE TABLE city 
(
  code NUMBER NOT NULL 
, descr VARCHAR2(50) 
, CONSTRAINT city_pk PRIMARY KEY 
  (
    code 
  )
  USING INDEX 
  (
      CREATE UNIQUE INDEX city_pk ON city (code ASC) 
      TABLESPACE move_data 
  )
  enable 
) 
nologging TABLESPACE move_data;
 
INSERT INTO city VALUES (1,'Paris');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (2,'Lyon');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (3,'Marseille');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (4,'Bordeaux');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (5,'Lille');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (6,'Toulouse');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (7,'Nantes');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (8,'Montpellier');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (9,'Dijon');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (10,'Arbois');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (11,'Nancy');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (12,'Troyes');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (13,'Bourges');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (14,'Tours');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (15,'Rennes');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (16,'Grenoble');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (17,'Annecy');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (18,'Rouen');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (19,'Brest');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (20,'Poitiers');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (21,'Metz');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (22,'Reims');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (23,'Amiens');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (24,'Caen');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (25,'Le Havre');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (26,'Quimper');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (27,'Saint-Nazaire');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (28,'Carcassonne');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (29,'Nimes');
INSERT INTO city VALUES (30,'Cannes');
 
COMMIT;
 
EXEC dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('yjaquier', 'city');

And a big fact table:

DROP TABLE sales;
 
CREATE TABLE sales(id NUMBER, city__code NUMBER, qty NUMBER, val VARCHAR2(100)) NOLOGGING TABLESPACE move_data;
 
DECLARE
i NUMBER;
nbrows NUMBER;
BEGIN
  i:=1;
  nbrows:=50000000;
  LOOP
    EXIT WHEN i>nbrows;
    INSERT INTO sales VALUES(i,ROUND(dbms_random.VALUE(1,30)),ROUND(dbms_random.VALUE(1,10000)),dbms_random.VALUE(1,10000));
		IF (MOD(i,100000)=0) THEN
		  COMMIT;
		END IF;
    i:=i+1;
  END LOOP;
  COMMIT;
END;
/
 
EXEC dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('yjaquier', 'sales');

I have been able to generate a 3GB fact table with 50,000,000 rows:

SQL> SELECT SUM(bytes)/(1024*1024) AS "Size MB"
FROM dba_extents
WHERE owner='YJAQUIER' AND segment_name='SALES';
 
   SIZE MB
----------
      3200

In-Memory testing

For testing I set below in my session:

sql> SET lines 200 pages 200 TIMING ON
sql> col sql_text FOR a90
sql> col plan_table_output FOR a180
SQL> SET autotrace traceonly EXPLAIN STATISTICS
sql> ALTER SESSION SET statistics_level=ALL;
 
SESSION altered.

I have used the below SQL statement, all in lowercase, aiming at getting sales in quantity and value per city. The comment /* Yannick */ helps to retrieve cursor in library cache:

select /* Yannick */ b.descr,sum(qty) as qty, sum(val) as val
from sales a, city b
where a.city__code=b.code
group by b.descr
order by b.descr;
SQL> SELECT /* Yannick */ b.descr,SUM(qty) AS qty, SUM(val) AS val
FROM sales a, city b
WHERE a.city__code=b.code
GROUP BY b.descr
ORDER BY b.descr;
 
30 ROWS selected.
 
Elapsed: 00:00:11.52
 
Execution PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------
PLAN hash VALUE: 518732835
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                 | Name     | ROWS  | Bytes | COST (%CPU)| TIME     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT          |          |    30 |  1770 |  8354   (2)| 00:00:01 |        |      |            |
|   1 |  PX COORDINATOR           |          |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX SEND QC (ORDER)      | :TQ10001 |    30 |  1770 |  8354   (2)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | P->S | QC (ORDER) |
|   3 |    SORT GROUP BY          |          |    30 |  1770 |  8354   (2)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   4 |     PX RECEIVE            |          |    30 |  1770 |  8354   (2)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   5 |      PX SEND RANGE        | :TQ10000 |    30 |  1770 |  8354   (2)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | P->P | RANGE      |
|   6 |       HASH GROUP BY       |          |    30 |  1770 |  8354   (2)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|*  7 |        HASH JOIN          |          |    50M|  2813M|  8238   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   8 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL | CITY     |    30 |   330 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   9 |         PX BLOCK ITERATOR |          |    50M|  2288M|  8225   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|  10 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL| SALES    |    50M|  2288M|  8225   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (IDENTIFIED BY operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   7 - ACCESS("A"."CITY__CODE"="B"."CODE")
 
Note
-----
   - dynamic STATISTICS used: dynamic sampling (LEVEL=AUTO)
   - automatic DOP: Computed Degree OF Parallelism IS 15
 
 
STATISTICS
----------------------------------------------------------
         90  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
     410173  consistent gets
     406420  physical reads
          0  redo SIZE
       2092  bytes sent via SQL*Net TO client
        563  bytes received via SQL*Net FROM client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips TO/FROM client
         16  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
         30  ROWS processed

Then I set In-Memory pool (static parameter):

inmemory_size=2G
parallel_degree_policy=auto

Remark:
The parallel_degree_policy=auto tuning is a good advise from a DBA colleague.

I started with the default compression method but my In-Memory pool was too small to store the sales table entirely:

SQL> ALTER TABLE sales inmemory priority critical;
 
TABLE altered.
 
SQL> col segment_name FOR a15
SQL> SELECT segment_name,inmemory_size,bytes,bytes_not_populated,populate_status,inmemory_priority,inmemory_distribute,inmemory_duplicate,inmemory_compression
FROM V$IM_SEGMENTS
WHERE owner='YJAQUIER'
AND segment_name IN ('CITY','SALES')
ORDER BY segment_name;
 
SEGMENT_NAME    INMEMORY_SIZE      BYTES BYTES_NOT_POPULATED POPULATE_ INMEMORY INMEMORY_DISTRI INMEMORY_DUPL INMEMORY_COMPRESS
--------------- ------------- ---------- ------------------- --------- -------- --------------- ------------- -----------------
SALES              1590755328 3355443200          1757536256 COMPLETED CRITICAL AUTO            NO DUPLICATE  FOR QUERY LOW

As it was difficult at that time to bounce the database (and also because my database server was running low on free memory) I decided to choose a different compression method (the best one to be clear). And this time my table fit in In-Memory pool. According to the In-Memory blog the Advanced Compression Enterprise edition option is not needed for those different compression algorithms:

SQL> ALTER TABLE city inmemory priority critical memcompress FOR capacity high;
 
TABLE altered.
 
SQL> SELECT segment_name,inmemory_size,bytes,bytes_not_populated,populate_status,inmemory_priority,inmemory_distribute,inmemory_duplicate,inmemory_compression
FROM V$IM_SEGMENTS
WHERE owner='YJAQUIER'
AND segment_name IN ('CITY','SALES')
ORDER BY segment_name;
 
SEGMENT_NAME    INMEMORY_SIZE      BYTES BYTES_NOT_POPULATED POPULATE_ INMEMORY INMEMORY_DISTRI INMEMORY_DUPL INMEMORY_COMPRESS
--------------- ------------- ---------- ------------------- --------- -------- --------------- ------------- -----------------
SALES              1337262080 3355443200                   0 COMPLETED CRITICAL AUTO            NO DUPLICATE  FOR CAPACITY HIGH

I have also tried to put the city small table in memory but as you see above there is no inmemory segment for this table even if the property is well changed in DBA_TABLES:

SQL> col TABLE_NAME FOR a15
SQL> SELECT table_name,inmemory FROM dba_tables WHERE owner='YJAQUIER' AND table_name IN ('CITY','SALES');
 
TABLE_NAME      INMEMORY
--------------- --------
CITY            ENABLED
SALES           ENABLED

I finally found why in 1950831.1 MOS note:

In the above example the in memory segment is not populated because the object is smaller than the “_inmemory_small_segment_threshold”, though the same would be true if the column/table had not yet completed loading into the in-memory segment

I initially started by executing the exact same query: we are supposed to change nothing as Oracle claims. But I have been disappointed:

SQL> SELECT /* Yannick */ b.descr,SUM(qty) AS qty, SUM(val) AS val
FROM sales a, city b
WHERE a.city__code=b.code
GROUP BY b.descr
ORDER BY b.descr;
 
30 ROWS selected.
 
Elapsed: 00:00:38.05
 
Execution PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------
PLAN hash VALUE: 6666487
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                      | Name     | ROWS  | Bytes | COST (%CPU)| TIME     |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |          |    30 |  1200 | 10798  (62)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  SORT GROUP BY                 |          |    30 |  1200 | 10798  (62)| 00:00:01 |
|*  2 |   HASH JOIN                    |          |    30 |  1200 | 10797  (62)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    VIEW                        | VW_GBC_5 |    30 |   870 | 10796  (62)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     HASH GROUP BY              |          |    30 |  1440 | 10796  (62)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |      TABLE ACCESS INMEMORY FULL| SALES    |    50M|  2288M|  8939  (54)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |    TABLE ACCESS INMEMORY FULL  | CITY     |    30 |   330 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (IDENTIFIED BY operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   2 - ACCESS("ITEM_1"="B"."CODE")
 
Note
-----
   - automatic DOP: Computed Degree OF Parallelism IS 1 because OF parallel threshold
 
 
STATISTICS
----------------------------------------------------------
        343  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
        532  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo SIZE
       2089  bytes sent via SQL*Net TO client
        563  bytes received via SQL*Net FROM client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips TO/FROM client
         70  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
         30  ROWS processed

More than 38 seconds, mainly due to the parallel degree that is not like in initial statement i.e. 15. The number of physical reads is obviously quite difference as here we use data that is fully stored in memory. I have initially tried to set the degree of parallelism of city and sales table to 15 but (strangely) it did not changed anything…

To try to trigger Auto_DOP (Degree Of Parallelism) I have tried playing with parallel_min_time_threshold initialization parameter at session level. This was providing intermediate result mainly because of auto-DOP that was at 5 and not 15. Execution time was twice higher so around 20 seconds:

SELECT /* Yannick */ b.descr,SUM(qty) AS qty, SUM(val) AS val
FROM sales a, city b
WHERE a.city__code=b.code
GROUP BY b.descr
ORDER BY b.descr;
 
30 ROWS selected.
 
Elapsed: 00:00:19.95
 
Execution PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------
PLAN hash VALUE: 518732835
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                          | Name     | ROWS  | Bytes | COST (%CPU)| TIME     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                   |          |    30 |  1770 |  2391  (62)| 00:00:01 |        |      |            |
|   1 |  PX COORDINATOR                    |          |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX SEND QC (ORDER)               | :TQ10001 |    30 |  1770 |  2391  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | P->S | QC (ORDER) |
|   3 |    SORT GROUP BY                   |          |    30 |  1770 |  2391  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   4 |     PX RECEIVE                     |          |    30 |  1770 |  2391  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   5 |      PX SEND RANGE                 | :TQ10000 |    30 |  1770 |  2391  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | P->P | RANGE      |
|   6 |       HASH GROUP BY                |          |    30 |  1770 |  2391  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|*  7 |        HASH JOIN                   |          |    50M|  2813M|  2021  (55)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   8 |         TABLE ACCESS INMEMORY FULL | CITY     |    30 |   330 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   9 |         PX BLOCK ITERATOR          |          |    50M|  2288M|  1986  (54)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|  10 |          TABLE ACCESS INMEMORY FULL| SALES    |    50M|  2288M|  1986  (54)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (IDENTIFIED BY operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   7 - ACCESS("A"."CITY__CODE"="B"."CODE")
 
Note
-----
   - dynamic STATISTICS used: dynamic sampling (LEVEL=AUTO)
   - automatic DOP: Computed Degree OF Parallelism IS 5
   - parallel scans affinitized FOR buffer cache
   - parallel scans affinitized FOR inmemory
 
 
STATISTICS
----------------------------------------------------------
        308  recursive calls
         24  db block gets
       5219  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo SIZE
       2091  bytes sent via SQL*Net TO client
        563  bytes received via SQL*Net FROM client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips TO/FROM client
          6  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
         30  ROWS processed

So re-trying with a hint to force the DOP. Please note it is a bit in contradiction with what Oracle claims as we are not supposed to change anything while implementing In-Memory:

SELECT /* Yannick */ /*+ parallel (15) */ b.descr,SUM(qty) AS qty, SUM(val) AS val
FROM sales a, city b
WHERE a.city__code=b.code
GROUP BY b.descr
ORDER BY b.descr;
 
30 ROWS selected.
 
Elapsed: 00:00:06.66
 
Execution PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------
PLAN hash VALUE: 518732835
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                          | Name     | ROWS  | Bytes | COST (%CPU)| TIME     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                   |          |    30 |  1770 |   791  (62)| 00:00:01 |        |      |            |
|   1 |  PX COORDINATOR                    |          |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX SEND QC (ORDER)               | :TQ10001 |    30 |  1770 |   791  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | P->S | QC (ORDER) |
|   3 |    SORT GROUP BY                   |          |    30 |  1770 |   791  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   4 |     PX RECEIVE                     |          |    30 |  1770 |   791  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   5 |      PX SEND RANGE                 | :TQ10000 |    30 |  1770 |   791  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | P->P | RANGE      |
|   6 |       HASH GROUP BY                |          |    30 |  1770 |   791  (62)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|*  7 |        HASH JOIN                   |          |    50M|  2813M|   675  (55)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   8 |         TABLE ACCESS INMEMORY FULL | CITY     |    30 |   330 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   9 |         PX BLOCK ITERATOR          |          |    50M|  2288M|   662  (54)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|  10 |          TABLE ACCESS INMEMORY FULL| SALES    |    50M|  2288M|   662  (54)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (IDENTIFIED BY operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   7 - ACCESS("A"."CITY__CODE"="B"."CODE")
 
Note
-----
   - dynamic STATISTICS used: dynamic sampling (LEVEL=AUTO)
   - Degree OF Parallelism IS 15 because OF hint
 
 
STATISTICS
----------------------------------------------------------
         90  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
       1784  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo SIZE
       2092  bytes sent via SQL*Net TO client
        563  bytes received via SQL*Net FROM client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips TO/FROM client
         16  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
         30  ROWS processed

Ok it is better the response time is divided by two around, I even had execution time of 4 and half seconds…

Conclusion

As we have seen the implementation in itself is really straightforward. Then in real life my simple example did not benefit automatically from In-Memory as the auto-DOP feature did not fire as exactly without the option. But at the end I have been able to drastically improve the overall response time.

You might ask what if I want the sales for only one city and create an index on the sales.city__code column ? It has been stated at a global conference at Oracle Open Word 2014, an index access should be as quick as an In-Memory access. If you create this index (index and histograms on sales.city__code column) you will notice that CBO does not use it, forcing its usage does not speed up the query not to say it slows it down:

SQL> CREATE INDEX sales_idx_city__code ON sales (city__code) 
TABLESPACE move_data;
 
INDEX created.
 
SQL> EXEC dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('yjaquier', 'sales');
 
PL/SQL PROCEDURE successfully completed.
 
SQL> col column_name FOR a15
SQL> SELECT column_name,histogram
     FROM dba_tab_col_statistics
     WHERE owner='YJAQUIER'
     AND table_name='SALES'
     ORDER BY column_name;
 
COLUMN_NAME     HISTOGRAM
--------------- ---------------
CITY__CODE      FREQUENCY
ID              NONE
QTY             NONE
VAL             NONE

Then the default COB choice is to not use the index (the In-Memory options have been removed):

SELECT /* Yannick */ b.descr,SUM(qty) AS qty, SUM(val) AS val
FROM sales a, city b
WHERE a.city__code=b.code
AND b.descr='Arbois'
GROUP BY b.descr
ORDER BY b.descr;
 
Elapsed: 00:00:09.86
 
Execution PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------
PLAN hash VALUE: 3852374841
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                  | Name     | ROWS  | Bytes | COST (%CPU)| TIME     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT           |          |     1 |    59 | 12355   (1)| 00:00:01 |        |      |            |
|   1 |  PX COORDINATOR            |          |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX SEND QC (RANDOM)      | :TQ10001 |     1 |    59 | 12355   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
|   3 |    HASH GROUP BY           |          |     1 |    59 | 12355   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   4 |     PX RECEIVE             |          |     1 |    59 | 12355   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   5 |      PX SEND HASH          | :TQ10000 |     1 |    59 | 12355   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | P->P | HASH       |
|   6 |       HASH GROUP BY        |          |     1 |    59 | 12355   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|*  7 |        HASH JOIN           |          |  1435K|    80M| 12355   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   8 |         JOIN FILTER CREATE | :BF0000  |     1 |    11 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|*  9 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL | CITY     |     1 |    11 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|  10 |         JOIN FILTER USE    | :BF0000  |    50M|  2288M| 12337   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|  11 |          PX BLOCK ITERATOR |          |    50M|  2288M| 12337   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|* 12 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL| SALES    |    50M|  2288M| 12337   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (IDENTIFIED BY operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   7 - ACCESS("A"."CITY__CODE"="B"."CODE")
   9 - filter("B"."DESCR"='Arbois')
  12 - filter(SYS_OP_BLOOM_FILTER(:BF0000,"A"."CITY__CODE"))
 
Note
-----
   - dynamic STATISTICS used: dynamic sampling (LEVEL=AUTO)
   - automatic DOP: Computed Degree OF Parallelism IS 10
 
 
STATISTICS
----------------------------------------------------------
         60  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
     409033  consistent gets
     406420  physical reads
          0  redo SIZE
        702  bytes sent via SQL*Net TO client
        552  bytes received via SQL*Net FROM client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips TO/FROM client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  ROWS processed

The explain plan with a NESTED LOOP (NL) and fixing the parallelism to 10 for apple to apple comparison:

SELECT /* Yannick */ /*+ index (a sales_idx_city__code) parallel (10) */ b.descr,SUM(qty) AS qty, SUM(val) AS val
FROM sales a, city b
WHERE a.city__code=b.code
AND b.descr='Arbois'
GROUP BY b.descr
ORDER BY b.descr;
 
Elapsed: 00:00:09.41
 
Execution PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------
PLAN hash VALUE: 2685725527
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                          | Name                 | ROWS  | Bytes | COST (%CPU)| TIME     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                   |                      |     1 |    59 | 45750   (1)| 00:00:02 |        |      |            |
|   1 |  PX COORDINATOR                    |                      |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX SEND QC (RANDOM)              | :TQ10001             |     1 |    59 | 45750   (1)| 00:00:02 |  Q1,01 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
|   3 |    HASH GROUP BY                   |                      |     1 |    59 | 45750   (1)| 00:00:02 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   4 |     PX RECEIVE                     |                      |     1 |    59 | 45750   (1)| 00:00:02 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   5 |      PX SEND HASH                  | :TQ10000             |     1 |    59 | 45750   (1)| 00:00:02 |  Q1,00 | P->P | HASH       |
|   6 |       HASH GROUP BY                |                      |     1 |    59 | 45750   (1)| 00:00:02 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   7 |        NESTED LOOPS                |                      |  1435K|    80M| 45750   (1)| 00:00:02 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   8 |         NESTED LOOPS               |                      |  1704K|    80M| 45750   (1)| 00:00:02 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   9 |          PX BLOCK ITERATOR         |                      |       |       |            |          |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|* 10 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL        | CITY                 |     1 |    11 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|* 11 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN          | SALES_IDX_CITY__CODE |  1704K|       |   371   (1)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|  12 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SALES                |  1435K|    65M| 45748   (1)| 00:00:02 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (IDENTIFIED BY operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
  10 - filter("B"."DESCR"='Arbois')
  11 - ACCESS("A"."CITY__CODE"="B"."CODE")
 
Note
-----
   - dynamic STATISTICS used: dynamic sampling (LEVEL=AUTO)
   - Degree OF Parallelism IS 10 because OF hint
 
 
STATISTICS
----------------------------------------------------------
         60  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
     404388  consistent gets
     382963  physical reads
          0  redo SIZE
        702  bytes sent via SQL*Net TO client
        552  bytes received via SQL*Net FROM client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips TO/FROM client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  ROWS processed

The execution time is almost the same, number of consistent read is constant but normally NL access are good when number of rows retrieve with the index is small but here the detailed explain plan returns 3,446,000 rows retrieve by index rowid…

And it is really where Oracle In-Memory option has a clear added value because:

  • You cannot create and index on every column of your fact table. Think of a BI environment with a fact table having tens of columns and also because creating so many indexes will use disk space and add overhead in maintenance.
  • Even if an index is there Oracle might not use it and favor an HASH JOIN (HJ) with a Full Table Scan (FTS) instead of a NL.

References

About Post Author

3 thoughts on “In-Memory Column Store simple example and performance comparison

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>